[chris] Recording round two

Submitted by wheattoast on June 22, 2007 - 7:33pm. ::


So today I set up a mic in my bedroom, turned off the noisy A/C, and recorded my round two live challenges. I can't say that it went smashingly. I'd hoped that the reading exercise would be first, giving me a chance to get relax a bit in front of the mic, but we started with the free association, and challenge which I'd been dreading somewhat since it was announced. The first word offered was "suitcase" (which I now see was one of Jim's suggestions, posted on the prtq message boards!), and I passed on that, thus being stuck with whatever was offered next. It turned out to be "Who do you trust?" Not a bad topic at all, but my nervousness and coffee jitters got the best of me. Being the cynical type, I immediately thought of who I didn't trust, and with labored breaths I self-consciously muttered on about doctors. Ugh.

In hindsight I realize I probably should have thought more strategically about how to immediately unpack a topic. If I didn't have a perfect targeted response, it would have been wise to brainstorm aloud, listing off trustworthy (or untrustworthy) people (or types of people) and then, with a variety of options laid out before me, I could have relaxedly chosen the strongest among them. A simple moment's reflection would have given me used car salesmen, politicians, advertisers, holy men, etc., but in my anxious haste, I grabbed onto doctors (who, after all, really aren't all that untrustworthy).

Still, it wasn't all that bad. I think I did fine in the other two parts of the challenge (the pronunciation of Atahuallpa notwithstanding), and even though extemporaneous rants are not my forte, I really did enjoy putting myself in such a very uncomfortable situation. It's gotta be good for ones character, right?

I've always known that if I did ever get my own radio show, it would not be of the live chat variety. I make my art in my own neurotic privacy, and only after exhaustive revisions do I diffidently offer it up for public entertainment. Yes, part of my life involves performing a live puppet show, but every millisecond of that show has been worked out beforehand. And, it's the puppets on stage, not me.

My preparation for the word association challenge was probably misguided, I now realize. Instead of focusing on performance issues, I spent my time voraciously reading. I thought that the more ideas I had freshly swimming about in my head, the more likely it'd be that I'd have something to say about the topic. Should Izzy have offered "Zoroastrianism", "Parisian cemeteries" or "Oedoen von Horvath", I'd have been in heaven. I thought that by reading closely, by exploring and indulging my responses to various texts it'd be pretty much the same as responding out loud. Silly book-headed me.

Of course, I'm still so very hopeful that I'll make it to round three. I don't have any sort of network to rely on for the popular vote, but maybe, just maybe the judges will let me eek through this round.

Keeping my fingers crossed.

Submitted by Katie Ball on June 23, 2007 - 2:48pm.

Best of luck to you.

-kb

Submitted by ursabear on June 23, 2007 - 11:20am.

I enjoyed reading your thoughts about what you were thinking and how you were thinking of your entry.

Jimmy Bear
----
My entry: http://www.publicradioquest.com/node/197
Blog?
http://blog.jimmybearpearson.com
Music, Singles, Samples?
http://jimmybearpearson.com/purchase.php

Submitted by Theresa Bakker on June 22, 2007 - 8:20pm.

Thanks for telling this great story. You are a writer of splendiferous talent. It's been fun being along with you on this journey. And if you really can pronounce "Zoroastrianism," you should win on preperation alone. Unpack your suitcase. I definately hope you'll be staying awhile.

Submitted by mavis j on June 22, 2007 - 8:36pm.

I wonder. The likes of us, (and you know who I mean by us), liking each other didn't seem to help any of us any. Maybe we will jinx Chris by fussing over him too much. Even though I am wearing my wheattoast rally cap backwards.

Submitted by Theresa Bakker on June 22, 2007 - 8:42pm.

First I said, "We liked Chris then, though" Then I thought, "Geez, I can't speak for the rest of 'us,' whoever that may be." I'm starting to think of myself as an extension of the PRTQ. The Q must really have powers beyond our imagination, or mine anyway.

Back to my original thought, so if one or more of us liked him to begin with, maybe there's a wheattoast double negative shield that protects him from the "getting liked by the PRTQ posters" jinx. What do you think? I mean, what do we think?

Submitted by Jim Barfuss on June 22, 2007 - 8:53pm.

I rode it through Elizabeth Park this evening. It was the toast of Trenton. Sure to go on backorder.
Of course the Q has magical powers. She's the Q! As in PRTQ! And you must be the T. But where does that leave Mavis and me? There's no J. Golly...

Submitted by mavis j on June 22, 2007 - 9:01pm.

can't have everyone liking it too much too fast. especially not in trendsetting trenton. our candidate needs to build momentum slowly.

Submitted by mavis j on June 22, 2007 - 9:02pm.

had to pop that one in didn't you?

Submitted by Jim Barfuss on June 22, 2007 - 8:14pm.

Moving to Argentina on your scooter and you've got no thoughts about suitcases? No one ever left one full of embarrassing things at the motel? Amazing.
Some of us are hoping that one of you had to talk about monkeys (from one of the Rich guy's lists).
You should have been reading People magazine. Then you'd know who to trust.

Submitted by mavis j on June 22, 2007 - 8:18pm.

says he should have thought more strategically about how to immediately unpack a topic.

UNPACK. SUITCASE. TOPIC. Guess you really need to hit the guy over the head with it. Meanwhile, he's off looking for Jim Morrison's grave or something.

Don't worry Chris we only tease you because we like you. ;)

Submitted by mavis j on June 22, 2007 - 8:11pm.

How about a challenge to do a puppet show involving these three?

Submitted by Rich Meitin on June 22, 2007 - 8:07pm.

... your candor and vulnerability in reporting about your experience the way you did. You seem like a great guy. I'm looking forward to hearing the result, and congratulations on everything so far!

Rich Meitin
www.richmeitin.com
http://www.publicradioquest.com/node/1038

Submitted by rebirth80 on June 23, 2007 - 6:06pm.

Agreed, you seem a lot of fun - bet you went better than you thought. :)

Submitted by wheattoast on June 23, 2007 - 6:36pm.

I appreciate your (and everyone's) positive thoughts. Very kind. This morning, after a miserable night shift, I gave a listen to my free association and indeed it wasn't the hopeless mess I remember. I've made a far bigger fool of myself elsewhere in my life - this brief gaff is manageable. The thing I noticed about it was that I was just so dull and uninspired. I don't mean it as an excuse, but I do think that recording in the mid-afternoon really (when a 3rd shift worker's circadian rhythms are much like what a normal person's might be at, say 5 am) really killed me. I'm not a "morning" person, in fact I'm a humorless demon for the first several hours after I arise. I suppose it's better that I came off as bit of a dolt as opposed to a cranky arse. But, c'est la vie. It was an experience that I'll always cherish, even if that particular audio file is headed for the bloopers bin.